|
Bush Supports Home-Bred Terrorists
|
By Scott Huminski
[Hits: 18519]
|
|
[President Bush, Alberto Gonzales & Senator Dole support terrorthreats and civil rights violations within the U.S..]
The administration and the Bush appointed Justice Department areso obsessed with a foreign "war on terror" that they have chosento look the other way concerning home-bred terror perpetrated byour own government officials against U.S. citizens.
Below is a quote from an American prosecutor that President Bushand Alberto Gonzales' Justice Department believe is just fine,
"The last claim involves a statement made to attorney xxxxxxxwarning that the defendant would be charged with additionalcrimes if he did not clam[sic] down. The statement is areference to the defendant's continued harassment of the victimand the investigating officer in this case through the courtprocess. The defendant has filed a civil action against thevictim because of his participation in this criminal case. TheState is currently reviewing a contempt charge against thedefendants because of this activity. The statement was a properwarning made through the defendant's representative."
This is an actual written quote from a powerful republicanprosecutor filed in court documents. It is a federal crime tothreaten someone for filing civil litigation in federal court orfor their participation in federal civil litigation. Threateningsomeone with adverse consequences whether it be breaking theirarm or threatening them with an illegal and frivolous criminalprosecution is known as extortion and obstruction of justice.The above open-ended threat also constitutes violation of thefederal racketeering statutes and federal civil rights crimes.The fact that the criminals in this instance carry governmentissued badges and guns heightens the terror, which is now alsoapproved by the President and Attorney General Gonzales.
A glance at the legal system's own ethical cannons explain veryclearly why threats of this nature against civil proceedings areforbidden and criminal,
..." The civil adjudicative process is primarily designed forthe settlement of disputes between parties, while the criminalprocess is designed for the protection of society as a whole.Threatening to use, or using, the criminal process to coerceadjustment of private civil claims or controversies is asubversion of that process; further, the person against whom thecriminal process is so misused may be deterred from assertinghis legal rights and thus the usefulness of the civil process insettling private disputes is impaired. As in all cases of abuseof judicial process, the improper use of criminal process tendsto diminish public confidence in our legal system." ...
Obstruction of federal civil litigation by the government itselfis not only a crime against individual victims, it constitutesan attack on the integrity of the federal court system signalinga demise of the rule of law and adversary court process in thiscountry. This trend is advocated by the current administrationand the Justice Department. The courts have become a powerfultool for the government to abuse and manipulate.
In correspondence, President Bush failed to respond to thisissue. Alberto Gonzales and his Justice Department indicatedthat the conduct was fine and not even a civil rights violation.Senator Elizabeth Dole had an equally callous and unethicalresponse to this crime targeting the federal courts.
The above quote constitutes the on-going threat of violentarrest and incarceration for exercising a right clearlyprotected by the first amendment -redress of grievances infederal court. Government threats of criminal retaliation for acitizen's pursuit of civil claims in federal court is also animpermissible coercion tactic violative of Due Process.
Constitutional rights of our own citizenry must be securedbefore preaching abroad concerning foreign constitutions, rightsand freedoms.
In the same series of correspondences, the President, AttorneyGeneral Gonzales and Senator Dole expressed no concern about thethreats of violent arrest and incarceration targeting citizensfor merely attempting to exercise the clearly established firstamendment right to attend and observe courthouse proceedings.Secret courts are not a precept that should be sheltered orembraced by our President or the Justice Department.
While the above instances reveal how this country is evolvinginto a police state with zero concern for rights, liberties andfreedoms, ironically, we hold ourselves up as the example forothers to emulate. President Bush, lets get it right here beforewe attempt to impose our system on others. Our military isrisking their lives in foreign lands to protect rights, freedomsand liberties that currently exist only on paper in thiscountry. The politicians that have directed our troops to engagein foreign conflict are the very same individuals who have wageda war to undermine our constitutional rights within our ownborders.
The willingness of those in power to inspire fear in the publicwith threats of political imprisonment for stating a position,filing a paper in court or merely attending a court proceedingis terrorism. The President and Justice Department's willingnessto allow these practices supports and encourages further terrorand terrorism.
Alberto Gonzales' Justice Department concludes that the above,"does not involve a prosecutable violation of federal criminalcivil rights statutes [18 U.S.C., ¡ì¡ì 241, 242].". See statutesbelow. In the United States today, the mere exercise of basicFirst Amendment rights is met with terrorist threats of arrestand political imprisonment reminiscent of Stalinist Russia whilethe courts have become government manipulated secret tribunalshiding the terror acts.
Scott Huminski North Carolina S_huminski@hotmail.com
Letters from the Justice Department, Elizabeth Dole and lettersto the President, Justice Dept. & Sen. Dole available on requestvia fax.
UNITED STATES CODE Title 18
Sec. 241. - Conspiracy against rights
If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, orintimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth,Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of anyright or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws ofthe United States, or because of his having so exercised thesame; or
They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more thanten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committedin violation of this section or if such acts include kidnappingor an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attemptto commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, theyshall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term ofyears or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death
Sec. 242. - Deprivation of rights under color of law
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation,or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State,Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to thedeprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured orprotected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, orto different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account ofsuch person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race,than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall befined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, orboth; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed inviolation of this section or if such acts include the use,attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon,explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title orimprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if deathresults from the acts committed in violation of this section orif such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap,aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravatedsexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under thistitle, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both,or may be sentenced to death
|
|
|
|
|
|
